Tempe Historical Museum Oral Histories
Narrator: JAMES ELMORE
Interviewer: SCOTT SOLLIDAY
Date of Interview: August 13, 1997
Interview Number: OH - 158
James Elmore is Dean Emeritus of the Arizona State University College of Architecture. In
1966, as Dean of the Architecture College, he proposed a project for a group of fifth-year
architecture students, challenging them to find a way to "do something with the river." The
students' project, which called for turning the dry riverbed into a greenbelt of parks and
commercial development, became the conceptual model for the Rio Salado Project.
In this interview, he talks about the history Rio Salado Project since its inception in 1966,
including the role of Valley Forward in promoting the project, the unsuccessful bond election
in 1987, flood control, water supply, and the importance of the project to the Salt River
Valley.
FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 1998 Tempe Historical Museum
BEGIN SIDE ONE
SOLLIDAY: I wanted to ask you about, with the Rio Salado,
what we've started now, with the groundbreaking, everything
seems to focus on engineering. When you started this
project as a project for architecture students, it seems
like that was very different -- the difference from
architectural design to actually the engineering that's
required to make that happen.
ELMORE: Well, we didn't ever really get that specific, down
to engineering. It was strictly conceptual. We started it
because the year before, in '66, we had completed a year-
long project in which all of the classes, the five levels of
the college, focused on a project that we called
collectively "Valley Focus '66." And we thought that was
quite successful, with the publication that came from it.
And I thought that this is a good thing to have the whole
college with a single focus. So I said, "Next year let's do
something with the river." And so that's how it started.
The fifth-year class, in the fall semester, came up with the
concept of putting water back in the river. And they showed
even how it could be put there by just a matter of rerouting
the water in the Grand Canal, which would do it. Well, it
would work, but it really turned them on to see the
possibility of water there and what it could do. So there
are some pictures of that. You might want to go to the
slide library in the College of Architecture. There's a
notebook there on file, full of slides in transparent
sleeves, that show -- they go beyond this. But this will
tell you a lot too. You have a place for tapes in your
operation?
SOLLIDAY: Yes, we do have a video tape library. Now, you
said slides. Is that in the Architecture and Environmental
Design Library?
ELMORE: Yeah, downstairs in the old building, which to me
was the new building. (both chuckle)
SOLLIDAY: Okay, because I'd looked at a lot of things they
had there, and I hadn't seen any slides, Though. I'll have
to go and take a look.
ELMORE: Well, ask Diane Upchurch for the Rio Salado
notebook. See that white one right up there, with the two
black dots? (SOLLIDAY: Uh-huh.) Well it's a notebook like
that, that's full of 8« x 11 sleeves that show 20. But
they're essentially what's in here. So anyway, those are
sources that I think are more comprehensive than anything I
can spin off the top of my head right now. Did I answer
your question at all about how it started?
SOLLIDAY: Well, as it started -- let's see now, that was in
'66, was it? (ELMORE: Uh-huh.) And as a student project,
I know that there's lots of things to plan on putting
together as an exercise, but at what point did you realize
that this was something that could actually be done?
ELMORE: Be done? Well, I think architects are born
optimists. I mean, particularly when we're younger -- we
think anything can be done. But I think what turned it on
mainly to me, when I realized what was going on, was the day
that Dave Fulton burst into my office all excited. They had
found a map on which the river was label Rio Salado. So
that became the name of the project. And he seemed to
realize, as I did, that the project had a handle that people
could grasp it by. Of course now we have Rio Salado
Community College, Rio Salado Wrecking Company, and Rio
Salado Barber Shop. But the Rio Salado Project, I think was
the first that came on the scene. So. . . . Well, we went
through three phases, which will be described here, and had
a public presentation at the end of each one. And on the
third one. . . . With each of them we grew more detailed in
a smaller area. The first project was, I think they called
it "38 Miles Long." And then we focused on the area just
north of the campus, which is essentially where the town
lake is. And WE filled a town lake, too. And there's a
picture of that somewhere. And then in the fall of '69, at
the end of our third phase, we made a public presentation at
the Safari Hotel, a day-long conference there, at which
Larry Murren, who was the founding president of the Arizona
Academy that produces the State Town Halls, made the motion
that Valley Forward would be asked to assume the leadership
of the project, moving it out of academe into the real
world. And Valley Forward was just forming at that time,
and I was a founding member of it, and they asked me to
chair the Rio Salado Steering Committee, which I did for the
whole decade of the '70s. And the. . . . We conducted
several studies through that. This is one of them. They
came back to the College of Architecture in '77, I think it
was. But Valley Forward was instrumental in securing
passage of the bill that created the Rio Salado Development
District, which for the next seven years developed a master
plan and recommended the method of financing, and this all
came to a head with the election in 1987, at which it was
defeated. Not as a concept, but as a method of financing,
25› per hundred [$100] property tax. And so we all thought
it was kind of dead then, except Harry Mitchell, who was
Mayor of Tempe, said, "We're gonna do it!" And they're
doing it. (pause) It was the method of financing that was
turned down, not the concept, and we realized it from that
point on. It's happening just as a part of the normal
processes of city-building: Tempe is doing its thing;
Phoenix is doing its thing. Phoenix is a little slower than
Tempe. And Mesa is hardly off the ground, but it's
happening that way. It's happening, but cooperatively, and
Valley Forward is back in a positive, active role in
promoting it. I went to a meeting this morning that must
have been 50 people on the committee, that are going to
promote the project. I don't know if that's giving you what
you want or not.
SOLLIDAY: Yeah, it kind of covers the whole thing right
there. I think that. . . . One of the things I noticed --
I'm not sure what point this came in -- but the issue of
flood control, especially with the floods in '78 and '80.
Was that something that you were thinking of?
ELMORE: Oh, that was always a problem to be dealt with.
One of the earliest studies back in '72 or '73, I think, was
built around rubber dams. And in all of the later phases,
flood control was a part of it. This study was commissioned
to us by the [U.S. Army] Corps of Engineers to develop the
recreational possibilities that would be made possible with
the advent of flood control. But of course we, not being
engineers, didn't ever get into the engineering design of
it. That's in hand now.
SOLLIDAY: It just seems a little bit surprising to me that
today most people have no idea of the flood control aspect
of it. They see just the lake and think that that's the
whole reasoning for it.
ELMORE: I think it's been pretty well publicized, these
dams. That was certainly very evident in the groundbreaking
[on August 8, 1997]. You weren't there, were you?
SOLLIDAY: No, I couldn't make it there that day.
ELMORE: Well, I think everybody understands it pretty well.
I had an amusing thing happen just yesterday afternoon at
the gym. A guy that I know there identified me to a new
person as having something to do with the Rio Salado, and
the guy said, "What are you going to do about mosquitoes?"
(Solliday chuckles) I'd never heard that one before. I've
heard about flood control and things like that. Well, I
just said, "We're not gonna let 'em in!" (laughter) I just
figured a foolish question, foolish answer. But you know, I
believe that as a result of this symposium, and even leading
up to that, most people know what Rio Salado is. They have
embraced the concept, I think. And it's, I think, pretty
well received. There are always people who are naysayers,
because that's their claim to fame -- just say no to
something. (pause)
. . .
ELMORE: . . . I've made a lot of Rio Salado presentations
through all these years, and one time at a Rotary Club I was
-- the question [about] source of water always comes up,
just like "what do you do about bugs?" and "what do you do
about mosquitoes?" I was leaning kind of heavily on the
sources of water, saying that one of the prime sources will
be the recycled effluent of sewage treatment plants. So one
of the Rotarians came up to me afterward and said, "Boy,
this is a real community project. Everybody in town is
putting something into it!" (laughter) A lot of amusing
things, and a lot of unhappy things that developed. But
it's all on the way up now.
. . .
SOLLIDAY: . . . if you could sum up what the idea was back
in the late '60s, what you envisioned Rio Salado would be
like, or the concept, the most basic concept.
ELMORE: Well, it very quickly became apparent to us that
this was a really vast reservoir of open space that was
unique to the heart of a great city, right at its center.
And it was an ugly, awful thing, but there it was, and
cities all around it. And it just seemed to be a marvelous
opportunity for economic commercial development, as well as
recreational. People tend to view Rio Salado as a
recreational project, and indeed it is that, but it is also
a wise way of continuing to build our city -- regionally,
not just Tempe, but the other riverfront jurisdictions that
are progressing at their own pace, but it's all going to
happen. But early on, we saw what a remarkable opportunity
this was. The term "in-fill" was not in much use at that
time. It's talked about a lot now, (SOLLIDAY: We just
didn't worry about it then.) . . . building in town, where
the utilities are, where all the infrastructure exists --
instead of paying to follow it out into the desert. We've
already used up most of the farmlands, but again, I think
it's a wise way of building a city.
SOLLIDAY: So it sounds like what we're doing today with Rio
Salado, it really hasn't changed very much from the original
idea.
ELMORE: No. It's the same river, it's the same cities,
it's the same future. This is a way of accommodating the
growth that is inevitable and anticipated -- even though
there are those who would like there to be NO growth. It's
coming, and this is a good way to accommodate quite a bit of
it. So does that tend to answer your questions?
SOLLIDAY: Yes, I think so. That gives me a pretty good
idea. It's kind of surprising to me to hear that it hasn't
changed in 30 years -- or at least the underlying idea of
the reasons why, or what it will end up looking like after
it's done -- it's just a little bit surprising that it's the
same project that you'd started with, it sounds like.
ELMORE: (leaves microphone to look for something) I lost
this, but just found it the other day. This was our final
report in the College of Architecture. And this is the
drawing from which this rendering was made -- which
incidentally was made by the same delineator/artist who made
the rendering that you saw at the groundbreaking -- Julian
Clark, 30 years later, made that. . . . You know what I
mean, that shows the whole. . . . Maybe you don't know.
SOLLIDAY: The City's current plans?
ELMORE: (goes to fetch something else) This one.
SOLLIDAY: Oh, yes, of the town lake.
ELMORE: Yeah. Well, that was Julian Clark that made that,
and also made this. But I got this out because there are a
couple of pictures here that. . . . These are slides in the
library, in color, that show -- this was the first thing in
'66. This was '69. And this too. And this. This is kind
of fun. This is the students graphics that you see here.
So it's changed a little bit. It isn't now a free-flowing
lake like this -- it's a flood control channel with straight
edges -- but it's still water, and it still offers the
opportunity. So it's changed to THAT extent. See here they
even had a little tributary off to the side. Here's the
stadium.
SOLLIDAY: And the water went right back into the river
then?
ELMORE: Yeah, uh-huh. But you see, it was a concept with
us, and it has BEEN a concept over time. It is only now
becoming real, but it is still a concept -- evolving,
developing, but all on the basis of the idea that we can
rehabilitate what is a liability and turn it to our
advantage as we honor the river that is the reason we're
here. All 2« million of us are here because of that river.
SOLLIDAY: Well, it makes such a difference, too. I
remember in '78 and '80 when the floods came through. There
was so much destruction, and yet it was exciting to go to
the river and see something that looked beautiful, instead
of this ugly scar across the middle of the Valley.
ELMORE: Well, I think that. . . . And I believe there is
something that someone wrote one time about "the edge" --
making the point that the excitement, the interest, is at
the edge: At the edge where the land meets the air, that's
not too exciting. Where the sea meets the air is not --
well, it's exciting in its own way, but in a kind of limited
way. . . . But it's where the land meets the water that is
the edge. That is the reason that New York is there,
Washington, every city you can point to -- some for
different reasons, mostly commercial, functional operational
reasons. And they've all honored their river and taken
advantage of it. We haven't. But now we are.
SOLLIDAY: It's certainly going to be exciting to see the
water going in there for the first time.
ELMORE: Yeah, I say in a couple of the interviews I gave
that I now see. . . . At the time of the defeat of the
election, I sort of began to wonder if I'd ever see a
groundbreaking like that. But I saw it. And I think now,
as I've said, that I'll have a boat ride, even while I can
still paddle my own canoe. (chuckles) So I don't know if
you want these things or not. They're. . . .
SOLLIDAY: Yeah, that would be a wonderful addition for the
exhibit. We tend to focus a little bit on the recent things
because there's so much of it, but that would be real nice
to add in there. Yes. Okay, well, I think that answered
the questions I had there. I just had a few. I came across
a quote in there, too, "putting the water back into the
Salt." Is that the way that you characterized that early
on, when the project first started?
ELMORE: Well, actually, my directive was to do something
with the river. But the students came up with the idea of
putting water back in the river, and developed that to even
suggest the ways of GETTING the water. So. . . . (pause)
What was your question again? (both chuckle)
SOLLIDAY: Well, "putting the water back into the Salt," was
that something that you had suggested?
ELMORE: That's what turned them on to see the real
possibility. Without the water, it's just going to stay the
way it is -- will continue to be a dump. The water is what
MAKES it, because of that "edge theory" that I just
propounded. The interest is where the edge of the water is.
That's where the bike paths will be, and the hotels, and the
boat landings.
SOLLIDAY: A lot of activity!
ELMORE: Yeah.
END OF INTERVIEW
|