|
At an Oct. 8, 2009, Special
Budget Meeting of the City Council, staff provided an overview of the
financial challenges facing Tempe. In light of the difficult choices
that will be necessary to address these challenges, staff provided
Council with a list of 21 different budget balancing parameters that
could be used in developing a budget balancing plan. Each Councilmember
expressed their particular preference with regards to how strongly each
of the 21 measures should be considered in developing a plan to balance
the budget. The individual Councilmember choices were aggregated and
used to formulate a general framework for the City Manager and the
Budget Results Teams to use in developing recommended solutions. The
Council's rankings are listed below, from highest to lowest priority.
The eventual budget
balancing plan for 2010-11 that is presented by staff to Council, or
that is ultimately approved by the City Council, may or may not retain
the preferences that these early rankings indicate. Councilmembers have
the ability to reverse their collective early preferences and go in
different directions; these are meant to be an early indication for
staff of the focus with which potential budget solutions should be
pursued.
|
|
|
Sum |
|
Should the
elimination of vacant positions be evaluated? |
20 |
|
Should
organizational consolidation be considered? |
19 |
|
Should the
budget be balanced starting with FY 2010/11? |
18 |
|
Should the
reduction target include a contingency for future economic
uncertainties? |
18 |
|
Should a bed
tax rate increase be considered? |
18 |
|
Should the cost of
health care costs be capped at current levels? |
17 |
|
Should the City
partner with other entities to provide shared services? |
17 |
|
Should new
alternative service delivery models be considered in non public
safety areas? |
16 |
|
Should the
fund balance target policy be reduced? |
15 |
|
Should
program reductions/eliminations identified through a
prioritization of services process be considered? |
15 |
|
Should
outsourcing/contracting of programs be considered? |
15 |
|
Should all
special events be 100% cost recovery? |
15 |
|
Should another
Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) be offered? |
14 |
|
Should employee
health care contributions be increased? |
14 |
|
Should
mandatory reduced work weeks be considered? |
13 |
|
Should a
specific sales tax rate increase on individual taxable
activities be considered? |
12 |
|
Should new
alternative service delivery models be considered in public
safety? |
11 |
|
Should an
overall sales tax rate increase be considered? |
11 |
|
Should the General
Fund subsidize other funds? |
10 |
|
Should
reductions in staffing through layoffs be
considered? |
10 |
|
Should there be
across the board departmental budget cuts? |
7 |